Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

the ways we vote

  • Feb. 4th, 2008 at 7:06 PM

1) I am out of port wine

2) the elections are coming up tomorrow in this fine state

3) Re 1 & 2: this is a bad combination

4) I have been called twice by Obama supporters this week. Also, more to the point, Larry Lessig endorsed him. (This is old news but new to me). I have to admit that this is the only endorsement one way or the other that I think I've ever heard that would seriously make me re-consider a candidate.

5) But in the end I think Clinton can do more with women's rights, and education, and those are some places where this bleeding-heart liberal bleeds the most.

6) And there are more personal reasons for voting for Clinton, for me, which can be summed up this way.

Someone vandalized the Wikipedia entry on the 19th Amendment to read "The amazing Nineteenth Amendment may refer to..." -- and I have to agree, it's pretty amazing, that amendment. Pretty damn amazing, that is, that women have had the right to vote for just over 87 years in this country and not any longer than that, in a democracy that is supposedly going on 230+. Pretty damn amazing that we have had the vote for that long and Clinton is the first serious female presidential candidate (except for Pat Schroeder, who aside from her views on copyright I respect very much). (That list is enlightening; who knew that Benjamin Spock once ran as V.P.?) Pretty damn amazing that the glass ceiling, and whether or not she can bust through it, does not seem to be on the table for debate, even among people I respect who should know about glass ceilings, especially those who work in unequal fields like computing. Pretty damn amazing that it's convenient to not point out that 51% of this country has never had a president that represents them personally.

And yes, this is good: are we not so enlightened that we're over it, this is not an issue, look, she's running. But on the other hand, are we not even in a position to bring it up in public discussion, that misogyny lurks in corners and corridors of power?

7) But of course Obama is a historic candidate as well. I'm from the south, I know what this means -- big news, impossible news a few decades ago. The woman who called me about him the first time said he reminded her of Jack Kennedy, back in the day. And who doesn't want to vote for that kind of a candidate? Who doesn't want that energy? He throws rallies like rock concerts and his ads are brilliant and I agree with him on most things. But he won't win without a crazy push from liberal voters, and voters like me, and that is why I am on the fence.

8) But at least I won't be sad about either one of them getting the nomination, and that has to be some kind of first. If either gets elected president, we can have an outrageous party on my birthday, a year from now...

9) And now to decide whether to get up early, or go late to the polls after work with everyone else; one tiny drop in the bucket towards -- what? A small, mediated kind of revolution?


This personal essay is brilliant, and nicely summarizes what I am going through, more eloquently than I have.

Comments

[info]kenllama wrote:
Feb. 5th, 2008 04:24 am (UTC)
planning to write in the cat
that *is* a good essay, and my confusion/dissatisfaction mirrors hers. like lessig, my chance to vote for someone i mostly feel good about went out the window with edwards (who was still decidedly imperfect, but was ok.)

i'm planning to take the chicken's way out: i'm hoping that my vote won't matter by the time my turn rolls around next month in ohio... i will vote for either clinton or obama in november, and i almost don't...

shards. i was going to say i don't care which, but that isn't really true. i care pretty deeply, but i don't have a strong preference. alas.

good luck, phoebe, and go find yourself some port.

in other news (cf my post earlier): i'm going to be in SF the first week in April. come dancing with me? or otherwise frolicking? i would love to see you. how challenging is it for you to get and from SF?

*hugs and the best of everything*
Ken
[info]blogdrassil wrote:
Feb. 5th, 2008 05:39 am (UTC)
I'm still working out my logic, but I know it will mean a lot more to me when she wins if her gender was never on the table.

I'll go to the polls.

And then I'll write you a letter, because I'm a shit. <3
[info]jtglover wrote:
Feb. 5th, 2008 11:10 am (UTC)
But he won't win without a crazy push from liberal voters, and voters like me, and that is why I am on the fence.

You really think so? I'm pretty undecided myself at the moment, but I think he will be a hell of a lot more palatable to the country at large than the Republican alternative. And as to the primaries? I dunno. Last time I looked, O. and C. were in a dead heat.

I may write in one of my stuffed animals.
[info]meestagoat wrote:
Feb. 5th, 2008 02:26 pm (UTC)
I totally relate to this. Obama is almost certainly going to win my state, so I don't feel quite as much pressure--but I was thinking last night about myself as a teenager, when I was sure--dead sure--that there wouldn't be a woman president in my lifetime. I keep thinking about that Laura--a teenager, sure, but a smart, hopeful, feminist one--and thinking I should vote with her in mind.